One of these days maybe I will get desperate enough to simply skip the formalities and go to a site like buy-a-hole.com – in the meantime I choose to pursue subjects that don’t cater to the cursed race known as women
Buber is marginalized, relatively speaking, and as a suspicious person I wonder about that, because he was one of those handful of people from the 20th century that was nobody’s fool.
I am, again, reading the above from Idel who is a (self-hating) Scholemite.
The Besht was born in 1698 so this is quite the tract of time we’re speaking of here. I’ve showed you before that the Scholem School (which is in opposition to Buber) rarely writes about recent mystical movements. Thanks for your interpretation of that medieval manuscript dude, tells me a lot, I really appreciate it. Nah, there might be something suspicious going on here, an obscuring of Hasidism.
If they keep us “more aware ones” focused on Kabbalah we might not be able to see the true roots of the modern zeitgeist. Because, for Buber, Hasidism decisively departs from Kabbalah. I’ll cut to the chase as I like to do- Scholem has a hegemony over the meaning of “Jewish religion”. They could be trying to hide something with this. And Buber, who disagrees with him, is in my opinion one of the legitimate “Tzadiqim” of recent times.
So are we to trust this Idel fellow about their debate? Idel after all is an absolutely dishonest individual in light of Bjerknes.
I don’t trust Sabbateans at their word, and Idel IS one of those
Buber, an exponent of Hasidism, and Scholem, a scholar in the field of Jewish mysticism in general, share a similar basic orientation: their reevaluation of Jewish mysticism is a crucial aspect of their literary activities, an integral part of their respective visions of national revival.
Idel is just another one in the long list of liars – that’s the real “history of the jews”.
Some people have 100,000 tweets and from every single one of them you can infer “it’s a nigger”. This is shabbos goys too. We’re not used to this level of documentation. Usually in history people spoke and their words disappeared in the wind, and now it’s recorded. The disturbing truth you will find is that often they are niggers now, and they were always niggers. There’s a reason that word is banned- it’s because it describes with the most directness way too many people. It’s a nigger.
That means you’re one of the brainless members of slaveworld that cannot be authentically counted as a “person”. What’s up nigger. Need to ban me? I know, the non-humans have a habit of doing that. What does it feel like to relate to some chimp in the jungle? Unfortunately I cannot relate to that.
“Planet Earth should only have animals living on it!” Yup, you’re a nigger.
My hope the last few years is dwindling toward nothing. We live in a slaveworld and no one can ever prove I’m wrong about that. “I will respond to you as a slave!” You only prove my point, nigger, thanks.