“If you think you’re so honest then why don’t you say your own personal thoughts about ‘love'”?

There are too many whores. I have a few of my favorite whores, and maybe one I like more than the others. That’s the state of “love” in our time.

We’d prefer monogamy, they’re just too disgusting usually so we see them as interchangable holes.

If anyone wants to step up and try to reform this, be my guest.

People would probably be happier with monogamy if I had to guess.

It must be a great weight to realize you’re a “permanent subhuman”. I bet that type would want to hide anyone who made that clear to them, at the expense of the world that wanted to be more than human.

“What’s the most absolutely devastating thing you could say about us?”

Isn’t that why you’re here…

You will auction off your personality to the highest bidder.

I can see the different sides of people, and their higher self is usually sacrificed.

What’s most devastating? The person reading this is a sold-soul.

“I need to make excuses about it!” Yeah, you sold your soul, and now you’re a nigger.

Cool, I get to talk to a monkey thing. Hi monkey thing, you’re so.. cute and uh.. not ugly and stuff.

“Our way of life is not rooted in the jewish people.” Keep telling yourself that. You’re just a nigger.

There are only a few interesting countries out there. I think North Korea is one of them. It’s similar to Myanmar or Iran in being relatively free from liberal-nihilism influence.

Wouldn’t it be funny if Kim Jong-un–김정은–himself was reading this? One can almost imagine it. The Koreans are “twinkies” and he seems to have a more elevated perspective than most in the world given his place as ruler of a sovereign kingdom.

World-leaders tend to have a feeling about wanting to put a burlap sack over the head of someone like me and drag me into the darkness, and he probably feels that impulse also.

That’s fine and natural, Kim. I still want to offer you advice because I care about your kingdom. 46,000 square miles of sovereign land – what could go wrong?

My most immediate suggestion would be to recognize your closeness with Xi Jinping. I mean this in a mental sense. This is unavoidable if you are a small country on the border of a vast country. Kim and Xi are two distinct individuals. If Xi is a puppet then Kim has to be a puppet too.

“나는 그와 같은 꼭두각시가 아니다. 나는 시진핑을 조롱한다.”

I only suggest Kim examine his psyche closely to identify how he admires Xi. When I look into his mind there is a “venn diagram” where part of his personality is Xi.

“내가 왜 미국인을 믿을까요?”

Great question. Some of us don’t relate to the American “cause” and see people like you more relatable.

My point to Kim is that the most serious problem he has to contend with is excising not only the west from his mind but Xi Jinping too.

Koreans are superior to the Chinese, they just have a smaller population. Xi shouldn’t be the last judgment.

Can you believe they have this?

Audible.com has most of roger’s plays fully dramatized, and each one for around only $10.

I’m starting a new piece’a crap job pretty soon and Audible’s been my good friend throughout the years. Some books are made to be listened to rather than read. One of my favorites in this regard is William S. Burroughs’ corpus. Others, like Hegel- don’t even bother trying to absorb that via audio.

It’s growing eerie how human-like AI is getting. I was on the phone with an automated voice yesterday and it almost felt like I was talking to an actual person. I think we could use this tek to create audiobooks of various of our favorite thoughtcrime books that they obviously will not sell on Audible. So people like me who no one will hire for an intellectual job can at least continue learning through the monotony of drudgery.

I have this little wireless earbud that is flesh-colored, with about 6 hours of battery life in between charges.

“Why don’t you just invest in the stock market or something?” That is not my techne. My whole personality would have to change in order to enter the world of Mammon. Like I said the other day, paraphrasing neech, the qualities required for a philosopher are inherently self-destructive. I mean, just look at the founder of the “movement”- sentenced to death.

It’s just amazing that we have actors who read these things for us

So usually, if you watch a film portrayal of Sherlock, it’s not Doyle verbatim. You get Doyle’s direct words when you listen to the audio, so it’s kind of the best of both worlds.

Most of the jobs I’ve had they didn’t let you listen to audio, so you have to be careful about the kind you pick. Because then you’re getting paid to absorb awesome books, basically. In the academy this is also the case, you just have to sell your soul to be part of the academy.

Yup, that’s for damn sure

I’ve never actually tried Heidegger. Maybe I’m experienced enough in his thought at this point. According to Gadamer, his lectures were vastly different than his writings. There’s a lot of emotion in philosophy that is important I think. It took me a while to pick up on the emotions in Nietzsche’s writings.

I know I have certain people who intentionally promote ZOG-friendly writers in order to obscure me. They’ve been doing that for years. So this is kind of just how I make the best of the situation. You can’t expect niggers to have any virtue. Speaking of Kant, people tend to be a lot closer to Sade.

This reminds me, I should listen to a Jane Austen novel narrated by a woman, I’ll probably pick up on more of the subtleties that way. I know I’m such a bad, evil person who deserves to live under a bridge, it’s crystal-clear.

Okay, I’m listening

my own motives for taking on the task of shedding light on Lacan’s ‘darkest’ moment

Many say that “Kant with Sade” is one of the most difficult texts he ever wrote. Just on the surface I’m perplexed how those two thinkers could go together.

For starters, both believed in an unconventional morality.

Okay, I see where this is going

Lacan himself pointed to the ‘grain of salt’ with which Kant’s moral law could be spiced up

In some cases you can will Sadism on all of humanity. Also, being a “weirdo” (if you want to call it that) is something that could be universalized.

If you’re new to Kant, the cliche “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is a simplistic but accurate crystallization of his moral law.

where two of a kind meet and perform rituals of which both understand the significance. In these cases, violence is a form of play.

To be a good Kantian to a masochist is to be sadistic with them.

Lacan sees Sade’s libertine novels as an extension of Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. At first glance you’d think Kant’s logic would rule out violence altogether.

Take another example

The Other proclaims to have the ‘right to enjoy’, whereas I am no more than the body who is about to be enjoyed ‘without any limit’ by this Other.

You want them to enjoy you without any limit also, i.e. even if you don’t really like it.

They’re right that this text is not easy to understand.

[Sade] spoke in the name of human Nature, which (unlike Rousseau) he defined as brutal, selfish, cruel and merciless

It seems in line with the Categorical Imperative to follow one’s nature, even if there are questionable aspects of that nature. Because you would want others to not deny their nature too.

Ironically, there’s something cruel about the Categorical Imperative itself. Kant himself concedes that virtuous compliance with the moral law can and often does cause pain.

I’m very reluctant to embrace this Sadean twist though because it can open the doors to a libertarian immoralism. For instance, if you wanted to “follow your Nature” and rape a baby what if someone did that to you when you were a baby?

This makes sense though

If the libertines experience pain, it is… only ever as an intentional means to an end, proficient as they are in transforming pain into pleasure.

I don’t claim to know why exactly many women in particular are like this, I only claim that many ARE like this. The phenomenon of masochism seems to complexify Kant’s theory rather than refute it. I don’t know why, when I tell a woman I’m going to use her as a urinal, she returns for more. You think I can explain that! Both sides of the equation are evidently “following their Nature”, and it is a questionable Nature we have.

Who cares, they [the libertine rogues] dare to say, about our neighbour’s pains? Do we feel them? No. Quite the opposite! We have just demonstrated that these pains engender a delicious sensation [in us]

What Lacan calls “delighting in evil” I see as just retribution. Cruelty to certain people is simply what they deserve, and some can even sense they deserve it (and that explains in part the pleasure they derive from it).

See, you can’t imagine Kant saying this, yet there seems to be something of a “moral law” about it

the sufferings of that slut inflame my imagination so intensely that I don’t quite know what I’m doing

We’re asking the question of “what being a good person” is.

I don’t think enjoying ourselves no matter the cost to others, as in the philosophy of Sade, is going to lead to a good society. At the same time, it doesn’t seem like it would be a good society if people weren’t allowed to follow their egoistic nature. So this is a mind-bending little puzzle of Lacan’s.

Oh god, I don’t know if I would like this

No offense, I just don’t like the idea of shaving my face side by side in the mirror with a woman in the morning. “Bigot!”

There must be something that doesn’t have negative side effects…

Again, I invoke the idea of how part of a woman wants to be a “movie director” or some such.

Doesn’t this make men seem like beasts?

The finer things in life too, just sayin.

“So you agree with the Kabbalists about the androgyne ideal!” There is a different version of that in the Alchemy tradition. I just think that “feminism” is exoteric and hides that this is their ideal. Try not to get offended, I’m trying to help- being women, they are confused about their own ideal.

I’ve known bodybuilders who do this, and don’t really like to advertise the fact

Brain imaging shows that testosterone therapy given as part of sex reassignment changes the brain structures and the pathway associated with speech and verbal fluency. This result supports research that women in general may deal with speech and interaction differently than men.

“You’re a Promethean Satanist challenging God’s Plan!” Sort of. I feel benevolent though.

Take Dugin’s daughter for instance. She was a philosopher of sorts. That is very rare for women. I speculate there could be a way to change their biology to make them “more serious people”. You’re not going to see the trannies and their typical advocates being so direct about this. That is because they need equalism and intersectionialsm to feel “cozy”. This isn’t the place for coziness, we’re here to improve humankind.

“How about I stick an estrogen syringe in your neck and then we can have some fairness?” I think I’ve said before that I see estradiol like a chick flick- I’m not going to actively seek it out but if someone brought it to me and encouraged I try it I might. The only way to understand Beauvoir is to BE Beauvoir. There are philosophical reasons to experiment with it. I just think being feminine only makes you easier to manipulate in our society so it’s not something I see myself getting hooked on.

“Oh so you finally admit the battle of the sexes was always about beasts manipulating women.” So what, they like it.

It was always a chemical battle?

Just think of the concept of “girly girl”- it’s implicitly something childish. Many women never grow up from that.

Remember Jim Donald? He influenced me back in the day, a solid dude (despite golem qualities). Anyway, he conned his doctor into prescribing him synthetic testosterone, and that probably explains his personality partially. (In our gynocracy doctors don’t like handing this out to men.)

I’ve never tried this so I can’t give you the best advice, just being a biological realist the potential application of this with certain types of people intrigues me. If you injected a Marxist for instance I bet he’d be less of a Marxist.

I also think this could cure women’s “hysteria” to some extent.

I mean, there’s also the danger of getting so close to being a man that you no longer turn us on. And I don’t think women would be happy in that scenario. “We’d lick each other’s pussies and moan with a deep voice, fuck you!” I doubt you’d be happy. There’s a reason the sexes are dimorphic.

We want to fix THIS problem

These cowards all over google are so afraid of talking about what’s important regarding this subject. They just keep saying excess hair growth, and nothing about personality changes.

Let me just state the matter to you clearly- testosterone therapy could possibly make women less of AIRHEADS.

I don’t think a woman is going to be happy with hairy tits, so. There must be a way to tweak the molecule or something.

Ugh, I just read “increased odds” somewhere and misread it at first as “increased odors”. That’s one of the reasons I could never be gay, because of the smell of men. I’m just setting you up to combine THE WORST OF BOTH sexes, don’t worry. Literally though it’s no joke that in our gynocracy that’s what we HAVE. Women who are shitty men and men who are shitty women. What a menagerie.

There it is…

Commie men have this decreased brain volume, you can take my word for it or not.

A golem is just a beta bitch. Airheaded as any woman.

Click here for the study on female-to-male brain changes.

Like I said before, in my eyes this is in the same ballpark as entheogen advocacy so it would be hypocritical to not entertain the possibility that it could be a benefit for certain people.

Media, like the Simpsons, where the man is portrayed as a buffoon, decreases brain volume in men too if I had to guess–and that’s everywhere.

The jews in general want men to be a bunch of pussies so there’s not anudduh shoah oy!!!!

I honestly think that testosterone might be able to make women more respectable in the political sphere. Again, this would be experimental, because the disadvantages could outweight the advantages, i.e. men might begin ignoring them and sniffing around toward the “girly girls”.

At the same time, it would be “hotter” if women could be as philosophical as men. It would be hotter if they were less of “natural communists” like they tend to be. It would be hotter if they could actually stand up for what’s right. Y’know, instead of being a weak-willed conformist in most cases.

Women who use HRT report having more energy and being more confident. Yeah, that’s why you’re living in a man’s world (despite all the social engineering to ameliorate it).

Another potential problem

I expect that for some, HRT would merely enhance women’s vices. More energy and confidence to be a dumb cunt if you could excuse my french.

I just think that one of the reasons they have so much depression is because they can’t do what men do, and I don’t like them to be depressed.

It starts with not having such a standard in the first place though. They’re trained from birth to think they’re interchangeable with men then they increasingly face the grim reality that they’re not. Just go back to giving them a dolly and telling them they’re going to be a great mommy some day. We can fix the “duck problem”, the solution just should be less extremist than it is now.

I repeat that many people are the jews’ failed experiments FOR LIFE though, so it’s not like handing a dolly to a girlboss is going to change her very much. Contrary to the blank-slatists I think the only way to be like a man is to alter your biology. Altering your attitude isn’t enough. So if you do find yourself to be a permanent, failed jewish experiment this could be something to look into in my opinion. Just a low dose, and you might find you’re a little less airheaded.

“Why don’t you tell us about your own subconscious.”

I’m a very lonely person, and embarressed that I masturbate so much.

“Why do you like to touch yourself?”

I’m a normal person who is horny and also think about higher ideals that make me cum really hard, or forget you said this.

“Why don’t you tell us the real reason you touch yourself.”

I believe in women with dignity, I only could love a woman with dignity.

“I want your whole body I want” — try to excvlai,a What a surprise with Slaves.

Excuse me, I meant “Slaves.”

I’m meant to not to heavy any recrining.

I just loved you before the beginniimg of time,

I ALWAYS loved you They try to hide you.

I only want a woman who eats my cum.

The TRUTH is, you’d be happier if your whole cunt were filled with jizz,,,…]

“I believe in “bought nigger”

I’m just chillin around the fountain.

Excuse me, an Italian woman thinks she can prove she understands aesthetics. Prove it Aria a