Me and my fellow part-paisano on the right quietly wondering why we let anglos eat at the same table as us

So much sour grapes cope like this I see constantly. Then again, we’re all living with WWII internalizations- whoa good for you brits you shot and bombed a bunch of italians looks like you’re the ones who are right, as is evidenced by all the muslims you’re letting move to your country.

Sometimes I wonder if being part italian is what has given me access to the ability to see through the eyes of the jew. I’m sure there will be a million disagreements but I’ve seen various DNA maps that show that jews are basically half-italian. Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m just a nerd about human-taxonomies, since not many else are (in public). It all goes back to “the mystery of being” for me.

Anyway, the way they think, I’m not even sure if it’s on a conscious level for a lot of them, actually I’m sure some of them learn how they think from reading me and merely use what they learn to accentuate their kikery, anyway though! they see euros as the species that gave birth to the technological age and they feel it is necessary for us to share the genes that led to that. They’re not a people themselves that shares, quite the opposite. They’re the people that wants to make others share. This is why I see most people as children- they’re just living downstream of this decision made by a people who probably should’ve been wiped out 75 years ago. So the argument from the axis side of things is that, if you like the technological age, not to mention its fine arts, we don’t want to create hybrids that would only decelerate scientific and artistic progress. If you like tech (uhh is there a cure for cancer yet?) and the occasional tv show [gesamtkunstwerk] that you could with a clear conscience call Art, then…

I honestly don’t remember much of what I used to rant about on XS back in the day- something about Lovecraft and gulags?

Glad to have a mutual disdain with humanity, wouldn’t have it any other way.

Anyway, I’m so sick of most people, children who have the rights of adults.

Socialism: an armed community which wishes to be free, which at bottom does not tolerate any hierarchy, which is united in its exploitation of common goods, which posits the group before the individual and gives to itself its own laws according to the exigencies of its life. […] “A man who does not consider his people and the honor of his people as the supreme value, has lost the right to be protected by this people.”

Nope, I don’t find Americans or their current ideoplex to be the supreme value. “gives to itself its own laws according to the exigencies of its life” – the reigning law being, be a moron and if everyone else does it too it’s okay.

This ‘face’ does not show as brightly since the Palestinian has been merged into a less rightful and more amorphous category than ‘the Other’. Alternatively, Levinas’ Israel cannot reach its sovereign ‘height’, that is, its greatest fulfilment of its ethical duties, were it to discharge heavy dues towards this minor Other.

Harsh way to frame it Emmanuel. Every day I’m more convinced that Jews have a maimonidean “two-face” instinct that goys can hardly fathom. They don’t let on to their 2face because part of having such a face is secretly seeing goys as “minor Others”.

I will soon bring your hiding-places to the light

therefore do I laugh in your face my laughter of the height

lol shut up Fred

J/ACC, when will you post that Martin Luther King Jr. was a nigger and get it over with already? 🥔💩

Otherwise go live in a random house in Atlanta and “tweet” from there coward. Jack controls all discourse and yet he’s one of these same elites we’ve been lampooning for years who lives behind “elitist” walls himself. Let’s have a live-filming of “people who believe in the blank-slate”. A reality tv show waiting just for you Jack.

Levinas the Schmittian where it counts

The Other isn’t the Enemy, the Other is infinity, the Other is divinity–well, except for the Others that are actually pertinent to politics. G-d forbid the Jews are wiped out before they fulfill their transcendent destiny of turning the entire planet into an 80 IQ dumpsterfire. Not to mention the irony that he formulated the Other concept itself in response to the holocaust, thus rendering Adolf himself the true “Other”. The above interview is basically him going, Yeah I’m cool I wrote 10 books about how the Nazis were evil, wait never mind!

Another hypocrisy that is demolished by Schmitt’s friend/enemy distinction. I.e. he wouldn’t have had to write books on the Other if there was some other out there he needed to address because they were wrong. I could go on and on about “Talmudic bullshitting”… or in other words, Schmitt was right to have them in mind when he crafted that friend/enemy distinction.

If you’re interested in a scientific description of the experience of empathy, the “Exteriority and the Face” section of Totality and Infinity by Levinas will help you understand leftists better than they understand themselves (not like that is very difficult)

To honor the holiday, I’ll use as an example the experience of talking with a black person. One–“one” being “the American white”–is implicitly put into question over slavery. There’s a sense in which something is “owed”, there is a demand to be “extra nice”, as payment. Seeing the face of a woman or a jew is similar though not identical. This is the basic experience that underlies interaction with them, this “being put into question”. “Excuse me! Don’t you remember historical so-and-so?!” they ask without having to ask. This is what I mean about not wanting to watch a movie with a woman who I wouldn’t be able to authentically interact with. Because, yes, I do remember historical so-and-so and you’ve already heard my honest opinion about women’s suffrage and my rational defenses of that opinion–want me to lie? Okay, why would I want to watch a movie with someone who demands I lie to them? Phenomenology helps us see the experienced-realities we take for granted and forget. Let me know how you like being put into question by it if you decide to read the section of the book I recommend.

Oh man, first time reading this since I lost my faith in liberalism

Well… you are judged by the content of your character. Be careful what you wish for.

“See, this is why we hate you! Burn in hell.”

Though I know this speech doesn’t carry the pretense of being anything more than rhetoric, it’s nonetheless been thoroughly refuted by the reactosphere.