A cruel holiday season, that is where I sense a lot of my trouble started
One of the most cherished and most safeguarded secrets in a matriarchy. They all know in their conscience that I’m right and instead of doing something to redeem themselves they only did the opposite, and thus perpetuated their errors among the younger generations.
“I’ll show him!!” Oh you really showed me alright. Piles and piles of evidence that the EU needs to be revised, and that certain people will be relegated to a symptom of Weimericization from the perspective of future historians.
“They wanted all our daughters to turn out to be worthless sluts like them” will be the general thesis.
If only, Tim…
Instead we have the same old irrational pop-monotheism under a new guise.
It is a scientific fact that leftism is a stupidity increase religion. It would be one thing if it was neutral. The problem is that it actively coerces its subjects into having faith in the diametrical opposite of what it should. This is stupid itself, so you can see it as a self-reinforcing feedback loop. You know that’s what diversity means, right? Again, my intention is not to be cruel, it’s just a fact that the esoteric meaning of diversity is stupidity. The empowerment of certain types of people who, historically, have not had any role in advanced civilization. Add them to the mix and everything will be fine, right? All “humans” are interchangeable, right? “We’re all humans”, there aren’t particular types of humans that are more prone to the irrational. Ahhh and they’re all in denial of this. They all band together, all the irrationals and people who feel sorry for them (a different type of irrationals) and they continue to reinforce the delusion together that they are not members of a stupidity increase cult. Once again, all they really care about is themselves, a brute fact that is. They only care about themselves so much that they will deny even this self-centeredness, it’s all a self-enclosed logic. And as the years go by and they all get even more stupid, they will simultaneously get even more blind to the fact that that’s what they’re doing. It’s all a voluntary spike downward in conscious awareness. And the most disturbing feature is, that no one is allowed to say anything against it.
The most fundamental fact I’ve gleaned from observing various of my antagonizing crypto-currents over the last year is that none will directly address any of my questions or arguments. It’s almost as if I know exactly the crimes that you can’t say in public. Can’t even bring them up to say they’re wrong, it’s always symbolism, evasion, ad hominem–not even rationalization, note, because that would actually require an answer, and that itself would be a crime, to respond to a crime. Funny idea of crime here, it makes sense though doesn’t it? You’d have to deduce that illusion is the law, it’s illegal to tell the truth, the only thing the informal law allows is falsehood. Or am I wrong? Well, go ahead and answer some of my questions for once, instead of responding to this with the consistent symbol, evasion, ad hominem, etc. Well…?
I know you won’t- wonder why I see a futility in posting.
Well…? All I want is answers. Maybe I’m wrong about all the things I’ve said? Seems if I were clearly wrong you’d be able to answer the questions, yeah?
If only I could be on camera with some of you leftist priests, no symbols or evasions there- at least, then, it’s not so easy.
Well? Make my day, show me why I shouldn’t be so cynical about you. Present-day leftism doesn’t permit any dialectic, any to and fro, any conversation. Don’t you think there’s something rotten about that? About anyone who participates in this non-conversation? I directly respond to the left on a daily basis, and so far from where I’m looking, it’s 1200 or so odd days of having my arguments evaded.
Unexpected Aristotle/Marx mash-up
Ties in with how Aristotle says that slaves can’t be expected to be moral agents.
So many different kinds of false-consciousness, and Marx’s and his contemporary appropriators’ versions are ironically false-consciousnesses unto themselves in deeming their own the most essential of the essential. 2400 years later we’re all still living in a Pre-Aristotelian time. Pre-Platonic too if you think of actually-existing Marxism (3rd-worldist feminism) as consisting of noble lies. What kind of philosopher-king is the cathedral, we deserve better than that.
I still think the slut-problem is the fault of men ultimately, often times young men. They sweet-talk young women into getting into their pants, just for a notch in the belt, a high-five with the bros, and after the women lose their virginity they develop a fuck-it attitude which snowballs. I remember walking down the hall holding hands with a girl in high school, the face of the old Christian math teacher has remained in my memory- pure disgust, and I wrote him off with an ok boomer attitude essentially though part of my conscience knew he was right. It all goes back to Jim’s simile which I would love for someone, preferably a scientist, to refute – from my experience it seems to be true: women are like sticky-tape, stick them on one thing they “work”, peel them off and stick them on something else they stick less, peel them off again! you get the point. Is this false? In sum, the world would be better off with young men who are more virtuous, and Christianity usually does the trick for that.
Because Globalist Realism is systematically locked up in a self-deceptive compartment in the minds of most, brace yourselves for an age of mimesis. The overwhelming statistical evidence shows that the majority of the world is only capable of copying already existing forms, so Brazilification will be at the same time a “Copyization” with any of the rapidly disappearing creatives being persecuted, until eventually the overall genetic stock will be so tarnished that not even copying the prior advanced civilization will be possible anymore. One by one the cognitive activities that most define being human will fall away obsolete and be forgotten, starting with the most complex.
I don’t think Leary is fair to Asia here – I’d speculate it’s closer to 85% – it’s interesting that I can even have this debate with him though:
It’s just a normal day seeing this kind of thought with me, imagine if this started printing out in a high school computer lab, or even college computer lab, or even a corporate office though. Why don’t they want people to be misanthropic about the rest of the world?
One can’t even describe the types of people in America too precisely without catching flak:
The futique minority should migrate to the rainforest for a couple years to become evermore futique, just sayin. Being in the same proximity as these people amounts to a voluntary dimming of cognition.
Let’s think about the mystery of the decentralized zeitgeist, I think that’s the key to seeing what a future regime-change would look like.
It’s necessary to get into the “What is” mood- What is government? (ask yourself that before being primed by my following speculations).
Imagine we’re all living in nature independently and we find each other in some clearing, one by one. Government would be about who is the ultimate arbiter of who decides for the group to prevent it disbanding into nature again into atomized foes. So think about the “decentralized zeitgeist” in this context. What we have in the present is a segment of the population we met in that clearing deciding for us what it is good to believe, and while there’s no formal government that can control this zeitgeist, most of both the gov-based and nongov-based power-nodes are in agreement with each other about what it is that is good for us to believe.
My idea for a regime-change is that there should be a formal centralization so that if the decentralized zeitgeist gets out of whack and decides for the rest of us that we should believe certain things that are not in fact good for us to believe it will step in and adjust it. Just voicing my thought in this clearing like anyone else living under the decentralized zeitgeist.
Government itself is “stepping in” when you boil it down to its fundamental basis. Someone in that state of nature and skeptical agreement decides to step in and say We need to team up, life will be easier for us, and all the better to combat the forces of nature if we work together. “So, here is how I think we should go about that,” says Primordial Government.
In that Know the Enemy thread I tried to demonstrate that what we take for “the government” today is only one of the various nodes. I argue, like Yarvin before me, that what our government is should actually be called the government. Gavel-slams in the supreme courts, politicians gathered together in a room with serious faces, the president himself, are all taken to be government, i.e. the ones who decide. We now know though that lots more outside the government decide for us. What I propose is a government in the original sense of the word that decides for the decentralized zeitgeist which in our day consists of governmental and non-governmental entities alike.
“Nice 700 page book, now make it 800.”
Nah. As with that “Deception” post, one “page” of that contains more thoughtcrime than 10,000 tweets of a given Twitter account, how about you cause chaos for my entertainment for a change? I know, this is asking the impossible from the terminally and shamelessly uncourageous.
Hey why are you still reading my personal journal.
The hottest fantasy I have is telling a girl to go off her birth control. I have to be careful though with the weltanschauung the way that it is. In our climate this is the expected result of that:
Millennials need to learn from their mistakes before it’s too late. I use swear words sometimes because they most accurately describe the reality of what I’m trying to talk about. We need to put an end to the slut-bastard cycle. It creates bad citizens and bad people in general, who in turn… And a lot of us are already products of that cycle ourselves so it’s not all our fault. It should end with us!